So I read this article and maybe because I am multitasking and was on a phone call at the same time I didn’t quite get but it seemed a little wishy washy to me. Basically he was kind of against but it was the law so he sought in some cases and now he is kinda of for it after getting close to the victims of a heinous crime but then innocent people might be killed too so that’s something to think about. I was just left confused. What changed but the shade of gray? Am I wrong? Clue me in Dallas!

PS- I think anyone who is for the death penalty should have to witness an execution

PPS- The death penalty creates more victims ie the family of the person who committed said heinous crime experiences grief and loss too – It’s all way more complicated than I have time to explore right now and the vitims families truly have my sympathy – their human rights have been violated in an aweful way that no one should have to experience – complicated more to come  . . .